Falsifiers

The detailed falsification boundary is now public in Risks and Criticisms. Its central question is whether evidence would show that Consullo is not a viable scaffold for governed recursive capability amplification.

The register includes failure signals for validator gaming, narrow-benchmark overfitting, unfavorable cost-to-capability ratios, fragility, opacity, rollback failure, ignored adversarial objections, alignment incidents, coordination overhead, and ceremonial rather than operational human authority.

No public evidence currently establishes that the program survives those falsifiers. A result counts only within its recorded scope, and self-authored diagnostics are not independent evidence.